Thursday, January 22, 2009

Test-driving the Sony e-book reader


I was given an e-book reader (the Sony one) for Christmas, so it finally gave me a chance to try one out. When these came out first, I was sceptical. I love the feel of a paper book, and I love to read in the bath, which is not something I'd risk with such an expensive piece of technology. But I'm open minded, and anything which offers me another way to get at books has to be good!
We were spending about ten days away over the Christmas break so it was the perfect opportunity to test it for real. I brought way less books than I usually would, which was just asa well, because we were barely within weight restrictions on the flight. Instead, I loaded the books that came with the reader, and boarded my flight.
I was actually surprised how easy it is to hold and read. Not exactly like a book, but close enough that when you've been reading a few minutes, and you've got used to the way you turn the page, you soon forget that it's anything different. It's not back-lit, so the screen is easy on the eye, and one of the winning features, when it gets late, and the old eyes get tired (or you've forgotten your glasses) you can increase the font size.
I have some niggles- there's no way of annotating text, or making notes, and frustratingly if you want to attach a notebook or even just a few bits of paper to the inside cover, you can't switch over the reader so that the 'empty' cover is on your right. Great for the left-handed, but I would have to reach across the text to scribble on a piece of paper inside the cover. For a technology which is ideal for text books, and for anyone who has to carry around a lot of books for the sake of their work (for example reviewers) I would have thought Sony would have wanted to make taking notes easier.
Then there's the books available. I know it's early days, but there's a limit to what books are available. The Sony shop itself has a poor selection (nearly all new releases) and Waterstones, which launched the reader in the UK and Ireland wasn't a whole lot better. Then I ran an Internet search on 'Richard Ford e-book', 'Roddy Doyle e-book', and 'Maeve Binchy e-book' and came up with a few titles, but most of them are available cheaper in paperback (and even hardback, new, if you look hard enough.)
Finally price- the reader itself is pricey enough, but for new books, publishers only offer a saving of a euro or two for the digital versus the printed version. This for doing the work of downloading the file onto your computer, and transferring onto your reader. (They save on printing, inventory, storage, transportation, invoicing and returns costs.)I know book price probably isn't the main reason why anyone would buy a digital rather than a real book, but if the publishers want to catch the reader who reads more than three or four books a year (and who else would fork out for a reader?) they're going to have to work harder on pricing. Personally, I can see myself catching up on my (out of copyright and cheap) Classics on the reader, but sticking to real books for most reading.

Thursday, January 15, 2009

Recycling vs Composting

I was listening to a radio piece this morning about a problem with kerbside recycling of paper. (It applies to some other recycled wastes too, but it's paper and cardboard I'm addressing here.)
First of all is the fact that most of the collected waste for recycling in Ireland goes to China. Transport = greenhouse gasses.
Secondly, the price obtained by recyclers for paper as a raw material for paper mills has dropped such that it is no longer as economically viable to collect the paper and ship it to China. And yet making recycled paper is 80% more efficient than making paper from wood pulp.
There is also the possibility of using the paper as a form of fuel.
So my question is, which is better for the environment (specifically from a greenhouse gas point of view)- curbside recycling of paper and cardboard, or composting it at home?
Most of the worm forums agree that torn up corrugated cardboard is the bedding of choice for home wormeries, and newspaper isn't bad either. But would it be better to recycle it? Is the energy used in transporting it to china sufficiently compensated for by the amount of energy saved by recycling paper rather than making it from pulp. And what about the trees saved? A mature, or 'ancient plantation' tree stores a lot more carbon than the saplings planted to replace it in 'renewable resource forestry'.
And what if the paper is burned as a fuel?
And if the compost generated in the garden is used to reduce the use of fuel intensive fertilisers? And used to grow home grown veggies to reduce food miles?
Has anyone done the maths? Is it possible to do the maths?

More Worms part 2!!

I've decided to bite the bullet and buy some more worms. I've ordered 2kg online so I'll have to get to work on getting a bin ready for them. I think I'll put them in the can-o-worms in the garage for the moment. Although it's cold out there, it doesn't freeze, and it's not as cold as outside. (And I think the other half might be upset by that many worms in the utility room). 2Kg of worms should get through a lot more waste than I'm feeding them at the moment but not more than we generate when you take all raw food into account aswell. I've ordered Dendrobaenas (E. Hortensis or European Nightcrawlers) and although some sources claim they're not as good as Red Wrigglers (E.Foetida), most say they're more robust in a poorly kept bin. Not that I plan on having a poorly kept bin, but I have killed off substantial fractions of herds before due to over-feeding and dampness. So I'll keep these worms separate for the moment to compare to the others, although it's not exactly a scientific comparison, because I'm sure the worms rescued from my outdoor wormery and brought indoors for winter, are almost certainly mixed species.
Now I can't wait for them to arrive- watch this space!!

Thursday, January 08, 2009

More worms

Following on from the last post- I've been doing a lot more reading up on Vermicomposting. There's a lot more information out there now, than there was when I started about ten years ago. Think of all the worms I've probably killed in the meantime. At least I haven't had to buy any fresh ones, I've just muddled along with the ones I started with and presumably a fairly healthy dose of their offspring.
But as I've given away about a quarter pound to the school, and I've only about a half pound of adults indoors that I rescued from the outdoor bing before it got too cold, I've decided to try a breeding experiment to get my numbers back up again before spring.
I've placed about 80 adult worms in smallish bin, with bedding and a small amount of food where I'll leave them for about 2-3 weeks. The idea being that they'll breed like mad- either because they keep bumping into suitable mates or because they think there's a shortage of food and the end of the world is nigh!
Then I'll remove the bedding, with the new cocoons, put it back into the main bin and start again. I read somewhere that you can produce loads of cocoons really fast this way, and cocoons hatch into baby worms and baby worms grow into bigger worms and make more cocoons.... And soon we'll be overrun with wooooorms!!

New Year's Resolution.

Blog more often!
7 days behind already!